They simply disagreed to you. Searching on the feedback departs me personally utilizing the summary you are the main one who escalated the tone with this conversation. In very first remark you write “All ladies are bisexual by default?” which hit me personally as reasonably hyperbolic. You have got extrapolated the potentially erroneous recognition with this one character that is gay imply that the list’s authors think each queer women can be bisexual by standard. That’s super unnecessary and defensive. And yes, it is obnoxious to choose this battle during bi presence and to make it very much a battle week. You will be usually the one that has both accused Autostraddle along with other commenters of lesbian erasure/lesbophobia AND assumed that they’re accusing you of biphobia in change, but whom called you biphobic? Provided your feedback about bi fandoms people that are attacking we wonder if perchance you’ve carried pornstars streaming throughout the power off their fandom fights right into a context where it does not use.
We don’t assume that a lesbian would have a problem n’t with bi erasure because We myself am a lesbian that has a issue with bi erasure. But as you aim the hand at bisexuals by singling down their fandoms for bad behavior, which makes me wonder when you can indicate opinions you’ve made here by which you object to bi erasure as aggressively and significantly as this so-called situation of lesbian erasure.
We as well as other those who called out of the addition of Waverly with this list ended up being literally called shitty by the individual you describe as diplomatic, that was the true point once I stopped being good. Funny how you’re OK with that but need as any proof from me an evidence of my good will, expecting I’ll spend hours looking for and making screenshots of my words and upload it to some server just so you would say it doesn’t matter anyway because you don’t see it. In the same way being called that is“shitty “diplomatic behavior” in this alt reality.
And that is just exactly what angers me personally the essential about any of it situation. Gaslighting and standards that are double. Calling away detailing as bisexual the type who’s very likely homosexual as she even utilized the term to explain by herself is definitely an assault on bisexual people now (that’s why we talked about insinuation of biphobia in addition, but of program we bet you didn’t notice it this way either the same as title calling is diplomatic) and we also shouldn’t have any difficulty because “who’s harmed by that”. Then your description this might be harmful because lesbian visibility is with in extremely bad state of program contributes to accusation that dealing with lesbians is hi jacking bi exposure week. You actually don’t see any issue for the reason that?
And something of the very disingenuous arguments, we attempt to forbid bi fans from seeing Wav as bi because a write-up on a site that is renowned at queer ladies is only the just like a viewpoint of a fan! Except it is maybe perhaps not. When folks see it they’ll get the feeling so it’s already formal. Which often can lead to huge stress on the authors and showrunners to stick to that even they planned, or they’ll face the fan wrath if it’s not what. And that’s really shitty.
Provided enough time you’re taking to argue that it isn’t a grudge carried over from a bi/lesbian fandom war but really a neutral argument from an individual who is reasonable to all or any, i believe it is significantly more than fair in my situation to inquire of one to straight back that claim up. You don’t need a screenshot, simply copy/paste something accusatory you’ve written re:bisexual erasure and url to the content it is from.
